Page 24 - TELEWAVE JULY-2016
        P. 24
     
       	               v.  Telecom Factory Wing:                  (a)  CPC from JTO(TF) to SDE (TF): Promotions are up to date under SCF quota barring a few vacancies.                      Promotions under LDCE quota are to be issued.                  (b)  CPC from SDE (TF) to AGM (TF): AGM(TF) promotions are to be issued to fill all vacant AGM Posts.           8.  Removal of anomalies in the TES Gr. ‘B’ officers’ seniority lists as per Hon’ble Court Judgments:               (a)  270  SDEs  seniority  case:  The  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  on  12.5.2008  passed  an  interim  order  for                  maintenance of "Status quo". In-spite of the said interim order, BSNL issued promotion order for the                  posts of DGM to 172 DE/AGM out of 270 SDEs on 8.2.2012. Contempt petition no. 403 of 2012 was                  filed by promote Sh. M. Shamugam for initiating contempt processing against contemnor CMD BSNL                  and other officials of BSNL. The said contempt petition no. 403 of 2012 was listed before the Hon'ble                  Supreme  Court  on  26.7.2013  and  the  Hon'ble  Court  issued  show  cause  notices  and  directed  for                  personal appearance of contemnors CMD, BSNL, Director(HR) and AGM (Pers.) of BSNL. The Contempt                  Case was heard on 23rd Sept 2013 and disposed-off but next date of hearing is yet to be announced.               (b)  147  SDEs  seniority  case:  AIBSNLEA  OA  2126/2009  in  Principal  Bench  CAT,  New  Delhi  reference                  mentioned in the Operative portion of the judgment on 147 SDEs (LDCE Quota) retrospective seniority                  case as:               “We have to remind ourselves, some more are waiting in the wings, watching the proceedings, to jump on               at the appropriate time. We cannot, but, record our deep anguish and displeasure at such conduct. We               say this, because, the matter has been raised in various Benches of the Central Administrative Tribunal in               Chandigarh,  Cuttack,  Calcutta  and  the  Principal  Bench  with  varying  results.  We  only  notice  the               proceedings pending before the Principal Bench (Judicial I) Delhi of the Central Administrative Tribunal, in               O.A 2126/2009 wherein all the 147 merit based candidates are stated to be parties. We have been taken               through the order of the Principal Bench dated 21.9.2011 wherein the proceedings pending before the               various  Benches  were  noticed,  while  considering  the  application  for  reference  to  a  larger  Bench.  The               Principal Bench has referred to OA No.86/2009 which challenged the seniority of the 147 persons as also               the stay order of this Court dated 18.2.2010. The Principal Bench in paragraph 11 held so:               Contention raised by the counsel for the respondents before us is that since two contradictory views have               been expressed by different Benches of the Tribunal, namely, Ernakulum Bench and Chandigarh Bench,               the matter should be referred to the Full Bench. We, however, of the opinion that even if the matter is               referred  to  the  Full  Bench,  no  purpose  would  be  served  because  ultimately  this  very  issue  is  pending               before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala. Once the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala gives its view, it would be               binding not only on the parties but also on the               Tribunal unless, it is upset by the Hon'ble Supreme Court or by some other High Court in some other               proceedings. At that time the matter can be finally resolved.”               BSNL  filed  an  SLP  in  the  Hon’ble  Supreme  Court  along  with  other  respondents.  The  BSNL  has  already               applied for withdrawal of its SLP. The next date of hearing is 02.09.2016.               (c)  1966 SDEs reversion case:                  (i)  The  CAT,  Bangalore  ordered  cancellation  of  DoT’s  order  creating  1966  posts  of  SDE’s  (By  up-                      gradation)  after  the  last  revision  of  TES  Group  ‘B’  recruitment  rules  (mainly  abolishing  the                      qualifying examination), which were added with the vacancies available prior to revision of the                      above  stated  Recruitment  Rules  to  hold  the  October  98  DPC  for  promotion  from  JTOs  to  TES                      Group ‘B’. The CAT also ordered to revert those from Karnataka Circle who were promoted in                      excess of the vacancies available in that circle. The second part of the judgment got implication on                      the entire DPC. In accordance with the court judgment DoT issued revised seniority list of TES                      Group ‘B’ officers. AIBSNLEA filed case in Delhi High Court against reversion and accordingly Delhi                      high Court granted stay order against posting reversion.                  (ii)  In the 1966 SDEs reversion case filed by our members in CAT Ernakulum and Kerala High Court,                      Hon’ble Courts has quashed the reversion order issued by DoT. The case was heard on 27.08.2007                      in Hon'ble Delhi High Court. The last hearing was on 13th May'2008. On the date of hearing in           TELEWAVE                                      24                                         JULY-2016
       
       
     





