Page 17 - TELEWAVE AUGUST-2015
        P. 17
     
       	           13.    Arbitrary deployment of ITS officers in BSNL has also adversely affected the Viability of BSNL. Around           3.5 lacs of staff belonging to Group-‘B’, Group-‘C‘ and Group-‘D’ cadre have been absorbed in BSNL w.e.f.           01/10/2000. Absorption of all Group-‘B’, Group-‘C’ and Group-‘D’ Employees in BSNL was completed in 2003.           Also majority of Group-‘A’ Officers from DOT belonging to Finance, Civil, Electrical, Architectural and Telecom           Factory wings have been absorbed in BSNL in the year 2005. But senior managerial cadre in BSNL consisting of           around  1400  Group  A  Officers  belonging  to  ITS  cadre  have  not  yet  been  absorbed  in  BSNL  even  after  a           continued deemed deputation status for 14 long years. These 1400 Officers belonging to ITS cadre are fully           determined  not  to  join  BSNL.  They  have  already  availed  the  benefits  of  sixth  Pay  Commission  along  with           regular promotions given by the controlling Ministry as deputationists in BSNL, and they have been enjoying           all  the  perks/higher  designations  in  BSNL.  But  they  do  not  want  to  belong  to  BSNL.  This  small  number  of           officers working on deputation in BSNL, who constitute the senior managerial cadre, want to continue as Govt.           Officers and enjoy the benefits of BSNL. But the actual fact is that the senior managerial level in BSNL does not           want to belong to BSNL but work in it on deputation as an outsider till their retirement without having any           stake in welfare and growth of BSNL.                  These ITS officers cannot motivate the workforce as they themselves do not have any faith in the           BSNL,  because  if  they  did,  they  would  have  been  regular  employees  of  this  company  with  full  stake.  This           uncertainty around the commitment of top management layer has resulted in governance deficit, and this is           having  a  direct  adverse  impact  on  performance  of  the  company,  which  is  jeopardizing  the  careers  and           livelihoods of lakhs of employees who had believed the government and even today have the conviction in           BSNL.           14.    Imposing VRS to 1 Lakh Employees in BSNL is not justified at this juncture. The current Executives           strength of BSNL as on 31st March 2015 is about 44,000 and non-executives staff strength is about 1, 79,000.           The staff strength of BSNL is going to be reduced to 20% i.e. one fifth of its current strength by the year 2017           on account of superannuation and it shall be further reduced to 30% of its current strength by the year 2018-           19. Hence, imposing VRS to one lakh employees in BSNL will over burden the existing employees as well as it           will be difficult to main about 28,000 telephones exchanges in the country. Moreover, VRS in no way has           helped MTNL viability since it was imposed thrice.           15.    Privatization / Disinvestment of BSNL can only help the Government to meet its budgetary deficits           because BSNL shall not be allowed to utilize any of the revenue earned by its disinvestment for the growth/           expansion of BSNL. After formation of MTNL a Navaratna Company 44% of its shares have been offloaded in           the Market but it has not led to any improvement in performance of MTNL or increase in its Market Share.                  How will privatization / disinvestment help BSNL in its growth or increase of its market share? Only a           motivated  workforce,  a  committed  management  and  faster  decision  process  in  finalization  of  Tenders,           procurement of equipment and clearance of associated bottlenecks can help BSNL in its growth and increase           of its Market Share. Only a strong and growing BSNL can keep the Telecom Prices in check and will not permit           free rein to private operators to form cartels and fleece the Public. But for the PSUs like BSNL the customers           would have never got Telecom Services so cheap as of now.           16.    Poor  After-Sales  Service  in  Broadband  Connections  /  Irresponsible  Call  Centers  /  Poor  Revenue           Collection and  strengthening  of Marketing  &  Sales units  of  BSNL.  These  services  have  been outsourced  to           different  vendors,  who  have  no  fear  of  losing  their  contract  and  they  are  not  carrying  out  their  job           satisfactorily bringing bad name to BSNL. A committed management can take adequate care to solve these           problems due to provision of inadequate service by these vendors/ outsourcing agents.           17.    Huge amounts of dues are pending for recovery from the customers to the tune of several thousand           crores of Revenue. BSNL has recently taken some steps for their recovery but more needs to be done by BSNL           Management and the Government on this account so that defaulting customers cannot evade payment while           they continue to receive Telecom Services from one operator or the other.           18.    Private  Service  Providers  are  approaching  to  BSNL  customers  door  to  door  and  offering  various           attractive plans and taking away its creamy customers. BSNL is not allowing to offer matching tariff to those           creamy customers to stop churning. Proper monitoring of franchisees / retailers, who should have all available           brands of BSNL, is required. More and more retailers / outlets of BSNL are also required in the market. BSNL           should create teams to bring enterprise business by way of door to door marketing and should concentrate to           provide quality service.           TELEWAVE                                   Page-17                                   AUGUST-2015
       
       
     





